Find a Lawyer

AMIR KHAN versus AJAB KHAN

Section 42 and 54 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), section 52 suit for declaration, permanent injunction and recovery of the sale consideration amount the plaintiff asserts that he owns the property and that Has been confirmed to confirm a sales change. In favor of the defendants, they were illegal and ineffective on the rights of the plaintiff on the basis of fraud and in return the plaintiff prayed for the recovery of the amount as the sale price of the suit property and the permanent injunction was granted Demanded that they be prevented from interfering with it. On the issue of non-payment of sales due to the rights of property, etc., it was placed heavily on the shoulders of the plaintiff, but by careful and reliable evidence he failed to refute the plaintiff. He had to prove his case by his own evidence and he could not benefit from it. The weakness of the defendant's case was able to disprove the evidence presented by the plaintiff in support of his claim that the ant and was subject to serious weaknesses and shortcomings, which were rejected by the trial court for valid reasons. Turned away from every aspect of the matter, discussed matters rightly and presented a decision of reasoning, which was not open to exception. In the presence of the Revenue Officers in question was confirmed in the General Assembly, the minor witness of the mutation and the plaintiff were affected by my claim of the plaintiff that the sale case was not paid and the defendant It has been delayed by Aliens. Make a firm stand for it for one reason or another immigration advocates email from Kashmir lawyer