Find a Lawyer

MALIK MUHAMMAD FAISAL versus STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION THROUGH CHAIRMAN AND 2 OTHERS

A. XXXVII, R2 and 3 of the Contract Act (IX of 1872), on the direction of the company company, section 19 suit for the collection of checks issued by the insurance company to the heirs of the deceased under the insurance policy. Withholding of check payments by the bank The check was obtained by fraudulently disclosing the date of disclosure by the deceased, while the pursuit of the insurance policy was revealed as false proof and verification as insurance. According to the policy, there was no other proof of his birth date except the national identity card, which was 8 8 1945. The date of birth of the deceased was 8 3 1940, while the deceased had stated his birth date 8 3 1940, while filling the Secondary School Examination form in 1957, which included a National Identity Card, the School of Secondary Education records said. There was a different dot birth. The exact and correct date of birth of the deceased was subsequently recorded, which is the earliest recorded in the school / board records, usually, once the insurance police was issued, on claim. Action was taken and the check was issued, then the matter will be proved wrong The deceased was committed at the time of receiving the insurance policy The check was issued on the basis of the insurance policy obtained through the fraud and misrepresentation. Went into the situation \ r \ n best advocate from Tibba Sultanpur lawyer