Find a Lawyer

BASHIR AHMAD versus STATE

Section 497 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Sections 302 and 324/34 bail, the defendant's denial was designated in the FIR The accused along with his accomplices, not only committed the murder of the deceased, In addition, the complainants were also injured and the other injured prosecution witnesses, who were three in number, had all the injured prosecution witnesses completely trapped in their statements under Section 161, the CRPC suspect arrested. Before long, the culprits were convicted and their co-accused were still in large numbers and were convicted. The case was settled for evidence that the complaint filed by the accused against the complainant was proceeding but no proceedings were made against the complaining party. The dispute was raised by the accused's lawyer that the accused was a co-accused. The person cannot be hurt, as mentioned in the FIR. The bail plea was discussed because it was a matter of evidence and the trial court will determine the evidence after recording the evidence, along with the accomplices from both parties with the joint motive for the murder of the accused. And no case was excluded after the prosecution witness's bail was granted due to the complainant and other injured persons. property advocate from Guddu lawyer