Find a Lawyer

HAIDER ALI versus STATE

Section 2 30b (b) Definition of evidence The names of the two accused were not only listed in the FIR, but also a specific role and specific injuries were attributed to them, however, in their supplementary statement K's brother was convicted as an alternate offender because no witnesses were found. Being present at the scene of the incident and they named the accused merely on Shakoa, the accused was acquitted by the trial court and his success was not challenged. According to witnesses, the two accused opened fire on the accused. There was disbelief. One accused needed very strong independent credible evidence to maintain the conviction of the other suspect, which was not available Medical evidence did not support ocular evidence Recovery of a pistol from the accused was not an empty vacancy. In the case it was unnecessary and is a total crime. The violation of the provisions of section 103 did not prove the motive behind the incident, as it was not credible, despite the suspect's assassination, the assailant would take the life of the person who was pursuing the case. Was acquitted under the circumstances top advocates from Jaffarabad lawyer