FARZANA THROUGH L.RS. versus NIKKA ALIAS HASOO THROUGH MST. ALLAH WASAI
O XX, R 5, O XLI & Section115 The petitioner's position in the review was that the appellate court below had erred in law when it failed to produce conclusions on all matters, and in the circumstances it had made the necessary provisions of O XX Was violated, read R 5 with the AXLI, CPC and it would not be objection to refer the matter to the following appellate court on remand of the case, after giving the result on all the cases again. A decision was allowed to review and the decision was rejected, and accordingly a remand for the matter was obtained.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocate from Loralai lawyer
