Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD IMRAN versus STATE

Section 497 of the Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Section 458 bail, denied the charge against the accused that he, along with his accomplices at the residence of the complainant at 7pm, equipped with firearms at Golden Point's golden jewelry and other articles. Robbed The lawyer for the accused worth Rs 5 lakh claimed that the names of the accused were not mentioned in the FIR, they had no power. Because it was generally known that the robbers and robbers did not know the complaining party and never gave their names at the time of commission of the crime and their names appeared on the inquiry when some indication was made. There was a reason for not mentioning the names of the accused in such an FIR. The benefit of which could not be extended to the accused. The crime against the accused was abhorrent and it was not against any individual, but such cases against the society were on the rise and the accused could not be let loose in the society, only to give them a chance to repeat the crime. For technical reasons, the accused was associated with the Commission, which falls under the section 497 (1), CRPC prohibition clause and was not entitled to bail. online advocate from Hyderabad lawyer