Find a Lawyer

PAKISTAN RAILWAY THROUGH CHAIRMAN, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, ISLAMABAD versus MUHAMMAD YASEEN

Article 199 Law Reforms Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 Constitution Petition Vending License Vendor license of applicants for stall at railway station, was terminated by authorities, applicants filed, accepted constitutional requests The orders to withdraw the High Court License against such termination were challenged on the grounds that before the termination of the vending license, the applicants had neither notice of the cause. Had not taken any explanation, and the whole process was done in a precarious manner and natural justice. Violation of applicants' rule was violated. It was also emphasized that the grounds on which their licenses were revoked was not a part of the terms of vending to the licensing authorities, no doubt the licenses could be revoked under the vending license clause, but to the authorities At least these requests have been obliged to issue notices. Doing unsatisfactory work violates any clause of the contract, but the authorities' immediate termination of the license, which was against the principles of the Natural Justice Order passed by the High Court in constitutional petitions, could not be disturbed in the intra-court appeal. Because the same principle was adopted keeping in mind. This law stipulates that any proposed action should be taken legally and not arbitrarily, the principles of justice have demanded that appropriate notice should be taken before any adverse action is taken against a party, in fact all relevant A light / light was displayed to the people, not to praise the law and the facts advocates from Daulat Pur lawyer