Find a Lawyer

SHAHID MAHMOOD versus STATE

Validating Section 302 evidence, the post-mortem report stated that only 12 bore of gunshot wound was fatal and not with rifle, as was mentioned in the FIR collusion with the police, to fill the lacuna in the prosecution case. ? Not only was the crime clear for the weapon, but the suspect's name was also fatally shot, according to the FIR, which was declared a co-accused, but before the trial court, it was reported that the suspect was in fact Equipped with 12 bore. There should be no mistaking the gunfire incident as it was a really widespread incident, especially when the parties were closely related, there was a clear conflict between the ocular account and the medical evidence, The accused along with the accused alleged that the case of litigation against the accused shot was of suspicious nature and that the benefit of doubt always goes to the accused and not to the prosecution, allowing appeal, conviction and sentencing. Is. y The trial court was set aside against the accused and the accused was acquitted and released from all charges leveled against him. immigration advocates from Amangarh lawyer