Find a Lawyer

IRFAN AHMED versus STATE

The definitions of sections 420, 468, 471, 409 and 109 of the National Accountability Ordinance (XVIII of 1999), sections 9 (a) (vi), 10 and 15 were not communicated to the FIA suspect after recording their statement. He will be extradited to the FIA after court hours. His confessional statement was recorded and declared an excuse in nature, the accused added the name of the question in a tender inquiry for healthy competition, his Approval, however, was granted to him by senior officials and the accused himself claimed to be innocent that the confessional statement of the accused is highly trusted by the prosecution, he too In its statements under Section 342, which is not placed before the accused, the PCP conviction cannot be based on the content of the offense. In its statement under Section 2342, the PC accused was not asked whether he made a voluntary confessional statement, before the accused's magistrate statement was uncertain, the accused also stated that the accused made a confessional statement. In which he committed the crime and his explanation was prosecuted, failing to deliver the crime from home under the circumstances, the court inquiry report revealed the names of six accused persons, but The National Accountability Bureau's reference was sent only against the release of the accused, saying that loud, loud and dry, without any rhyme or reason, The evidence against the co-accused was merely a statement of the accused under section 164, CR PC and stated that the statement was an excuse by nature and it would not be read against the other accused, it is said that the co-accused, only And this piece of evidence alone cannot be punished, be it on record online advocate from Pishin lawyer