Find a Lawyer

COL. JAVED IQBAL LODHI versus LT.-COL. NADEEM AHMAR

During the trial for the specific performance of the property sale agreement in section 22 Contract Act (IX of 1872), section 2 (b) civil procedure code (V8 1908), sections 148, 151 and O VII, R 11 suit, Twice the contract offered that if the plaintiff had deposited the balance consideration amount then he had no objection to this decree, the suit was limited to such offer only for a period of one week. The plaintiff did not accept the offer or submitted the deposit and requested that the deposit could not be made because the defendant had failed to fulfill his obligation regarding the outstanding balance of the housing authority. Such offer was repeated by the defendant and the court. Has expressly directed that if the plaintiff fails to submit the deposit by the next date, then the plaintiff will be rejected. And moved the request for review of the order. Until then, the plaintiff of the court had moved the petition for removal of the plaintiff's case for failure to submit the case, on both occasions, the offer was binding / binding. They were never made indefinitely and were never accepted by the plaintiff's offers, thus automatically withdrawing at the expiration of the time given by the defendant and in any case by the defendant. Offer never completed by acceptance from. Section 2 (b) of the Contract Act, 1872 and, therefore, no agreement was ever concluded between the parties, except when the defendant filed an application under section 151, CPC. Was not when default lawer from fb area from Kotla Pathan lawyer