TARIQ versus STATE
Section 426 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 2 Suspension Applicants / Suspects were sentenced under Section 2, PPC, for which they had lost evidence relating to the murder of three persons and Six years of imprisonment was imposed \ RI accused spent two years, eleven years, 24 months a month and the unexpected part of the sentence was three years six days since the accused was not convicted of murder of the accused. Was sentenced and sentenced to just 5, PPC and half of his sentence had already been paid and there was no sentence. Due to the overwhelming majority of appeals likely to appeal in the near future, the sentence given to the accused was suspended till the final decision of his appeal. \ r \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Jandanwala lawyer