Find a Lawyer

IBRAR HUSSAIN ALIAS BARA versus STATE

Sections 302 (b), 34, 324 and 337d Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Definition of Evidence in Filing Section 161 FIR, Case of Second Injury Witness filed under CCPC, Single Shot and According to the quantum of punishment, no crime was recovered. The report of the forensic science laboratory is not available on record. The accused / appellant allegedly killed the complainant's nephew with a single firearm while the shotgun participant (accused) The original brother (s) was injured in the shooting from the pistol, which caused the complainant's other nephew to be motivated in the same incident that the victim and his brother N The accused party and co-accused were prevented from standing on the road in which the victim was killed and his brother injured. The trial court sentenced the accused and sentenced the accused to death and imprisonment. Claimed. That the filing of the FIR was delayed by four hours. That the medical evidence contradicts the account. That there were contradictions in the statements of the prosecution witnesses. That purpose has not been proven. Since the recovery of the weapon from the accused was unnecessary and he did not repeat the bullet, so it was not a death sentence, the complainant had properly explained the delay in filing the FIR because naturally But the complainant's first priority was to save her. The life and injuries of the injured were reportedly taken to the hospital because the victim had prevented the accused from standing in the street in front of his house and a record was made to deny the motive established by the FIR. I was nothing, otherwise I would have to cross-examine during the complaint divorce advocates from Lawrence pur lawyer