Find a Lawyer

SYED TALIB HUSSAIN versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB THROUGH SECRETARY, AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT, LAHORE

Section 6 University of Agriculture, Faisalabad (Talent and Discipline) Constitution, 1975, Section 2 (1) (b) [as adopted by the University of Agriculture, Rawalpindi] Government employee not employed in the Government Department of Agriculture Was after the integration of the Research Institute with the University of Erich Agriculture University, a government employee requested the provincial government to return to its original department, which was rejected by the government. ? Without leave of ex-Pakistan, government employee was issued with show cause notice Government employee did not enter any response to the notice and eventually authorities dismissed him, the service Tribunal plea offered by the government employees. Was maintained. Not employed by the university, therefore, no action can be taken against them. Government notification has been transferred to the Government Employee through notification of the merger issued under Section 6 of the Aari Agricultural University, Paneri University, Rawalpindi, 1995. Did not challenge the notification and was due to the integration of section 6 of the University of Waste Agriculture, Rawalpindi Act 1995. The application for the return of civil servants was rejected and did not challenge the refusal. It was too late one day that a civil servant had to be reassigned from the implications of Section 6 of the University of Agriculture, Rawalpindi Act 1995, from any angle the matter was to be known to the public servant, the civil servant was the employee of the university and his Lawsuits were prosecuted by university authorities, which led to a fight against merit. family advocate from Sheikhupura lawyer