Find a Lawyer

SARFRAZ ALIAS SHAFFA versus STATE

The accused were sentenced to death in Article 2B of Pakistan (1973), Arts 45, 199 and 185 (3); the age of the accused not to be raised before the trial and the appellate courts was upheld by the Supreme Court. , The Constitutional Appeal filed for the benefit of the Special, the notification of the amnesty petition issued by the President Trial Court 13 12 2001 was sentenced to death for the accused / applicant convicted of murder and thereafter filed an appeal. The appeal against the High Court finding was dismissed by the High Court for leave. 5 The petitioner thereafter heard the constitutional petition before the High Court, which was formally awarded under Article 45 of the Constitution after the notification dated 13-12 2001 issued by the President of Pakistan in exercise of powers. It was claimed to take advantage of a special amnesty. It was appreciated by Section 2B of the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance 2000, it could not be sentenced to death, however, the constitutional application established by the petitioner was issued by the President on 12-12 2001, by a High Court justification notification. Was rejected, which revealed that provincial governments must ensure that the death sentence is sentenced to life imprisonment, as sentenced by the trial court. On such an exchange visit, the case was never taken before the trial or the appellate courts, in which the Supreme Court decided the petitioner's leave to leave for the preliminary appeal. Under which the High Court verdict was not upheld, the deserted phase could be made so that the applicant special family advocate from Tall lawyer