Find a Lawyer

MULAZIM HUSSAIN versus STATE

Articles 30 302 and 434 doubt // ????? ????? ??? ????? ????? ????? doubt ??? ????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ??? ??? ????? ??? ??? ??? ????? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??????????? ????? ????? ????? ??????? ????? ????? / ????? / / ????? ????? The witnesses / appellants of the defendant testified that he was armed with a firearm, knife and screwdriver. The son of the victim was killed and his other son was convicted under the trial court under Sections 302 and 34 and sentenced to life imprisonment. Under section 242424 and, 34, the PPC and the complainant's son were sentenced to five years in prison for the murderous assault. There was no need to mention the identity through the Flashlight Investigation Officer during the trial, who admitted it was a dark night. The most important article that could have established the source of the light was the flame in the light of which the allegedly-identified suspect was not captured, in the dark of night, the accused in the light of the light. Bulbs for identification, lanterns, etc., ample light availability, a chance to witness good looks or, one-to-one dialogue with the accused, closeness with the witnesses. In view of the non-interruption of the accused before the witnesses at the time of the incident, important aspects should be kept in mind; there is no prior contact of the accused with the witnesses and no communication was exchanged between the two sides. Also, it failed to prove that it was a year after the incident, the accused were arrested in this case and it was highly expected from the witnesses to identify the accused whose characteristics. Had little chance of remembering them, especially when watching them in the dark night lawer from fb area from Pasni lawyer