MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN versus STATE
Section 302 (b) Definition of Evidence The benefit of the doubt is that the two eyewitness testimony presented by the prosecution were relevant, unusual and opportunistic witnesses and were applied at a later stage in which a prosecutor's witness It was stated that besides the dead, there were many enemies. In this case, the accused happened in a deserted and isolated place and proceeded to repeat the evidence in the area other than his district of residence and to provide medical assistance rather than to provide assistance to the non-accountant. had gone. Post mortem inspection was performed the next day to discredit eyewitnesses. Such delays in relation to post-mortem inspections were usually suggested by an unexpected event in which the complaining party and the police had timely investigations. Used to find and place exact witnesses. And the fabrication of the prosecutor's story was not the destruction of the medical evidence acular account There was clear evidence on the record of the case that the accused knew of the witnesses' attempts to serve him through a warrant or declaration and That the accused had deliberately refrained from joining the investigation at the relevant time, no weapons were recovered from his possession. During the investigation of this case, the accused was not found in any circumstances, in the circumstances, available on the account of my account was not enough to prevent the matter related to the culprit of the accused in the murder of the victim, especially when the parties. The enmity between the two was acknowledged. The fact that the prosecution failed to prove the accused against any reasonable doubt
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
patent advocate from Gojra lawyer