QAISER IDREES versus MESSRS ZAIN TEXTILE (PVT.) LTD. THROUGH CHIEF EXECUTIVE
Implementation of section 47 claimed to determine the question of the execution plaintiff by the declaration circle that he was the owner of a super structure, including buildings, machinery, fittings, etc. on the first floor of the property of the court, the lending company. And he said that part of it was not responsible. In order to fulfill the order, it must be attached and sold. The trial court rightly rejected the execution on the ground that the execution request is pending and objections may be filed in the same proceedings as the CP Separate case was withheld under CK plaintiff. The contention is that Section 47 was not attracted to the CPC because it was not a party to the suit, so Plaintiff disclosed that the plaintiff was a shareholder in the judgment. Under section 47, the CPC raised not only the question among the parties but their representatives had to be involved in the matter. The court decides to execute the order and not through a separate trial court \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Panjgur lawyer