Find a Lawyer

I.J.S. & COMPANY THROUGH PARTNERS versus MESSRS ZULFIQAR ASSOCIATES LIMITED THROUGH CHIEF EXECUTIVE/OFFICE SECRETARY

The objection raised by the judgment debtor could not be substantiated by the banking court requesting execution as respondents to the execution of order Sa1c through OI, R 10 auction. The auction buyer filed an appeal after which all the parties compromised, the original agreement (the compromise process) was put on record and the parties prayed that the appeals be dealt with in light of the terms and conditions of the agreement. Applicants, meanwhile, appealed the claim that they claim the property or any part of it was declared. He had already filed a constitutional petition to declare his right to be immovable property and to enforce these provisions of the detention of the equity property, which had been adjourned before the permission of the High Court to proceed because the suit applied for the property. The rights and interests of the contributors were strictly constrained. And, ironically, if the property in question was allowed to disturb / transfer, part of the suit property in the possession of the applicants was due to the settlement between the parties on the appellants, the appeal was strictly settled under the agreement. The auction was confirmed in favor of auction buyers to the extent of the agreement. In order to protect the interests of the applicants through the banking court, it was held with the consent of the parties that such auction would be subject to the final results of the constitutional application filed by the applicants for such verification and rights. shall be. advocate from Kabir Wala lawyer