Find a Lawyer

AHMAD NAWAZ versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB

Section 12 and 56 (a) Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), Section 115 and A. XXXIX, RR 1, 2 Interim Order, Plaintiff's Claimant Claims to Suit with Landlord Owners Agreement, against which the defendants had previously sought a decree for possession through the land, in the pre-trial case the approved order was retained in favor of the defendant even before the plaintiff's case was filed by the plaintiff. The trial court dismissed and the appellate court denied the interim injunction, and the legitimate plaintiff merely contracted the sale. For the exclusive owners who did not create any right, title or interest in the exclusive ownership claimant's suit, they were already excluded by the trial court and before the trial court's decision and order was subject to scrutiny on appeal. That there is no aspect of the appellate court. The matter arguing in favor of this is that the exclusion was not issued for obstructing the legal proceedings in view of the provisions of section 66 (a) of the Special Relief Act, 1877, even if the claimant otherwise contended with the claimant. If the occupant was deprived, he could return to the proceedings through court proceedings in case of success in his case, while the plaintiff is unlikely to suffer any irreparable harm / injury. Defendant's benefit, which cannot be lost on suit property, despite the fact that its full value has already been accrued, the balance was in favor of the defendant and there was no inconvenience. Was unlikely. Plaintiff disputes properly stopped by appellate court, law / facts online advocate from Kala Bagh lawyer