SHAHZAD versus STATE
Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 392 bail, grant of further investigation could not identify the attacker because of the darkness because the accused did not know about the suspect before. Did not mention that nothing was recovered from the accused before the court but 36 days later the FIR was filed and said that the accused was not involved in the case. Investigation is needed after the suspect was behind bars and no further investigation is needed to keep the accused behind bars. Indefinitely, will not serve any useful purpose; the defendant's case, under the circumstances, demanded further investigation of his crime, even on the rule of consistency, the accused was entitled to bail because his co-accused. Was granted bail, in bail, under conditions
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocates from Bagh lawyer