Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

SHAHZAD versus STATE


Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 392 bail, grant of further investigation could not identify the attacker because of the darkness because the accused did not know about the suspect before. Did not mention that nothing was recovered from the accused before the court but 36 days later the FIR was filed and said that the accused was not involved in the case. Investigation is needed after the suspect was behind bars and no further investigation is needed to keep the accused behind bars. Indefinitely, will not serve any useful purpose; the defendant's case, under the circumstances, demanded further investigation of his crime, even on the rule of consistency, the accused was entitled to bail because his co-accused. Was granted bail, in bail, under conditions

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
advocates from Bagh lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.