Find a Lawyer

HAJI ABDUL RAUF versus S.H.O. SADDAR, RAHIMYAR KHAN

Article 406 Police Order (22 of 2002), Article 18 (3) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition Police declared the accused innocent during the inquiry The other police officer declared the accused guilty on the basis of his investigation. Had alleged that the opinion of the police officer who declared him innocent could not be reopened by any other police officer under the Federal Minister of Police, who had declared the accused innocent. There was no inquiry and the statement was merely information that was formed after consulting the police records. A file whose information could not be considered the final opinion of the Police Investigation Officer, although in any case it was given the free authority to assign it with full justice, but to establish its opinion on innocence or crime. No outside influence was accepted for. Those involved in the commission of the crime, but could not refrain from their duties by explaining their strangeness. In the course of investigating his higher positions, the actionable behavior would otherwise have been merely a police officer's opinion. There was an opinion, not the last word of the investigation, and it was not final so that the investigation chapter could be closed for the time to come. The police opportunity, considered to have been investigated on two occasions by a 2002 constitutional petition, was not enforceable by the accused and was dealt with accordingly. lawer from fb area from Nowshera Cantt lawyer