HAMID BAKHSH THROUGH L.RS. versus HUSSAIN BAKHSH THROUGH L.RS.
Articles 42 and 54 in the interest of the claimants filed a pre-emption petitioner arguing that the property in the dispute is a private dedication, which is a decorated and managed by the man who administered the mosque and The declaration demanded that Sajjad Nasheen and Mutli were entitled to occupy and take control of the place on this occasion and further requested that the defendants be prevented from interfering with its functions. The following was properly read by the appellate court, while amending the decree passed by the trial court did not raise any question of the law and on the record of appointment case in the office of the lawyer Sajjad for the defendants. Failing to indicate that false statements or evidence were not read, both the courts simultaneously decided in favor of the below nashin claimants and the courts held that the plaintiff is entitled to receive the proceeds of the shrine. , Other appeal dismissed,. r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Jhand lawyer
