PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION CORPORATION LTD. THROUGH CHAIRMAN/CEO versus DR. WAQAR HUSSAIN CHUDHARY
The defendant's request in any way related to any dispute or in any way related to obtaining contractual services in connection with the arbitration clause in connection with the trial proceedings for damages section 34 was that The claim for damages was not covered by such a clause. The plaintiff's extensive claim was essentially created and borne out of, and was a direct nexus of the claimant's claim to seek contractual services, and thus This clause was covered where there was an arbitration clause with a broad scope of reference for disputes over arbitration. Then, the provision of section 34 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, will be drawn that the proceedings in the case of the plaintiff were withheld in order to prevent the proceedings in the trial.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocate from Cherat lawyer