Find a Lawyer

SANA ULLAH versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB THROUGH SECRETARY, LIVESTOCK AND DAIRY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, LAHORE

Arts 25 and 199 Constitution Petition Citizens' Uniform Contract Employees were removed from the job on the grounds that their appointments were not in accordance with the default policy / merit Applicants were not accused or disqualified for appointment. The appointment was not made by a competent authority. The Authority has not taken any action against those responsible for such appointments. No charges have been made against the applicants that they have committed policy-based violations or have obtained appointments through misrepresentation, fraud, etc. ? Applicants from BS1 to BS4 were only punished, while appointments above BS4 were retained without any reason and therefore violated Article 25 of the Constitution. Discrimination cannot be accepted with approval etition appointments were largely canceled without notice and given the opportunity to be heard in the High Court. As proportional orders are announced, there are legitimate options that the applicants performing the duties will be paid their salaries. tax advocates from Machi Goth lawyer