Find a Lawyer

STATE versus QAMAR-UZ-ZAMNAN

Section 302 (b) Definition of Evidence The Benefit of Doubt Both the complainant, who was the father of the defendant and the other prosecutor's witness, were not witnesses because they did not see the accused while the witness of the deceased prosecutor was an opportunistic witness. And said that the prosecution witness had failed to provide any plausible explanation of what he was attracted to on the spot immediately after the incident, after which he could not usually postpone a post-mortem inspection there, The reason was that the FIR was not filed. The prosecutor's story was wasted quickly and timely in collecting the FIR could not be used as a controversial piece of evidence for the Akulon Account Court's testimony, after a tutored witness proved, the accused in any case It was not safe to rely on his statement to maintain a conviction against. The recovery of the pistol from the suspect's possession in connection with the execution of the suspect was also suspected that the incident did not occur. According to the testimony of the prosecution witnesses, no blank was recovered from the site, which was allegedly found by the accused. In the circumstances, the recovery of a pistol from the accused could not be used as a contradictory piece of evidence in an ocular account, which had already been found. The prosecution's story of the accused and the antitrust accused him of having no legs, because it was a case of accidental fire and that the accused was falsely implicated. Is. The accused, who was lacking in trial, was not brought home to the accused without any suspicion, trial immigration advocates phone number from Chowk Munda lawyer