ALLAH RAKHA versus STATE
The defendants, accusing Section 2 302 (b) of the evidence, made specific requests for good grave and sudden provocation of the two cases; to support the FIR version, the prosecutor did not present an independent witness, the prosecutor said. The prosecution's witnesses lived in a different location. And was present on the occasion when the accused's sister did not appear as a defense witness and he supported the defense, the request made by the accused Saeed witness was subjected to cross examination, but did not have credibility. The ski should be shaken as the defendant's defense plea was more understandable because the circumstances of the case led to the conclusion that in the event of two views, one person's supporter should be preferred. The accused's conviction was changed from offense under section 302 (b), PPC. Under Section 2302 (c), the PPC is accused of having already spent more than nine years in prison; its punishment was reduced to one term by which the execution of justice was brought to an end. Will meet
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
pakistani advocates Kurram Agency lawyer