MST. RUKHSANA BIBI versus S.H.O., POLICE STATION KAMEER
Article 199 of the Criminal Prohibition (Enforcement Code) Ordinance (VII VI of 1979), section 10 (2) and the 16 constitutional petitions submitted to the FIR applicant in person, stating that He was neither misled nor released by the accused. The adulterer's husband's relationship with her husband became strained and she moved in with her free will. The lady was locked in Darul Aman, Petitioner also filed a lawsuit to end the marriage, during which nothing was revealed. An inquiry into this offense was allowed under section 10 (2) or 16 of the Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979, the constitutional petition was allowed, the FIR against the applicant was dismissed by the High Court.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
