Find a Lawyer

PRESBYTERIAN MEDICAL BOARD THROUGH CHAIRMAN versus DR. NALSON AZEEM

Articles & 42 & 54 54 Service Charitable Medical Board and its Employees Relations Employees who were a doctor by profession and promoted as Medical Superintendent of the Board Hospital in connection with the termination of service and permanent injunction employed by the Board. Filed a declaratory suit alleging that termination of his services by the employer was unlawful and a false suit was directed to the employer to pay the dues he would have been entitled to if he had been a medical superintendent's employee. The injunction against the employer at work prevented them from interfering with the work as a deterrent. His job as a Medical Superintendent was also acknowledged by the employer that there was no legal code for the nature of an agreement between the parties. The matter was unable to be sustained as no further relief was sought to recover the alleged liabilities. And that the case of relief given to the employee by the trial court was against the employees that the employer has accepted the rules of disciplinary proceedings against his employees which required the opportunity of inquiry and hearing but not by the employer himself. The employee was tasked with violating such rules. The most important issue of the right to declare a declaration and injunction was the nature of the relationship between the parties and the dispute, whether the relationship was a contract in nature and if the nature of the contract was such as could be specifically enforced. Section 42 of the Special Relief Act, 1877, was banned from litigation, exceeding the notice of the courts - under this Act ask a advocate free from Mansehra lawyer