Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD IDREES versus STATE

Sections 561A, 516A and 550 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 420, 468, 471 and 109 were dismissed by the magistrate and the appellate court for simultaneous vehicle superintendence, petitioner filed section 555. A, had filed a petition against CRPC. He said that the issuer of the rejection had since learned that the buyer of the vehicle was suspicious and that the excise department had also transferred the vehicle in the name of the applicant, when the police had registered the police under Section 5050, Cr. Was captured. The PC said that no other claimant of the vehicle has been exposed, the applicant is entitled to go into custody of the vehicle, for his vehicle in custody / surrender, his application in the wrong court without taking into account the fact. As it was removed, the vehicle will be damaged if it is kept in police custody for an indefinite period. In order to accept the request, the detainee / Superda R was ordered to hand over the applicant accordingly. To be done pakistani advocates Rashidabad lawyer