Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHARIF versus MAHLA THROUGH LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES

Section 12 of the Evidence (10 of 1984), Article 79 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), OXIV, R1 suit, suit for the specific performance of the contract to sell the appellate court was excluded on the ground that it The contract under question was not proven. Article of Conan testimony, 1984, valid contract to sell certified by two witnesses must be proved in accordance with the provisions of the law, the evidence on record consisted of only one witness and thereby he wrote Article of Conan testimony. Did not meet the requirement of of79. Sell 1984 Although sell was registered in the contract but registration of a document in the office of the Registrar / Sub Registrar was not sufficient to prove its execution when the requests were made that matters were not properly arranged. I was not brought before the trial court so it was baseless. It was not fatal to give the wrong or precise form of a particular issue when the parties were fully aware of the nature of the actual dispute and had every opportunity. The sale agreement is said to prove that the owner of the suit died after it was executed by the landowner, therefore, it is necessary for the claimant to prove that the deceased had sold the money. Prove the case that was received and the sales balance failed to receive the amount, the appeal results, the circumstances were well argued pakistani advocates Dijkot lawyer