Find a Lawyer

ZAFAR IQBAL versus STATE

Section 497 Preventive Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 324, 337 F (iii), 148 and 149 bail, further inquiry was not charged against the accused that he had inflicted any injury on the victim only. The allegation against the accused was that he caused injury to the prosecution witness, none of them being attracted to the prohibited clause of section 497 (1) because of the injuries, the CRPC accused Was convicted of, and requested al-Libi to be on duty at a factory in another city. Employee, he obtained the support of the investigating agency from which the report of the discharge was prepared, but the magistrate declined to agree. Police say that part of the incident was not attributed to the suspect. The accused was not associated with anyone. In case of murder with the principal accused, there was no hostility, no chance of situations, the accused joined hands with the principal accused in attacking the complaining party. M was a resident of the district and nothing was on record to show that he had any social relations with the complaining party, who was a resident of the district since he was arrested; That he was totally unconnected in this matter and that he had nothing. The FIR was not even mentioned in the FIR. Along with the accused's involvement in the alleged incident and his criminal liability, these were questions that required further investigation within the meaning of section 497 of section 497, in CRPC circumstances, on bail. was done top civil advocates from Usta Mohammad lawyer