Find a Lawyer

PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION COMPANY LIMITED THROUGH GENERAL MANAGER AND 2 OTHERS versus MUHAMMAD ZAHID AND 28 OTHERS

The Arts 199 and 212 Civil Servants Act (LXXI of 1973), the Section 2A Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), the Section 3 Constitution Petition were the petitioner's argument, he had been acting as telephone operators for many years. That he was, in fact, an employee of PTCL and was being treated unfairly by the employees of the Telecommunications Foundation High Court who allowed the constitutional application and the applicants were allowed to enter the PTCL Pakistan. He was declared an employee of Telecommunication Company Limited, which appealed against the High Court's decision that the High Court had no jurisdiction over the matter as the petitioner, who claimed to be an employee of Pakistan Telecommunications Company Limited. What was, shall be considered public servants under section 2A of the Civil Servants Act 1973 and The ban on Article 212 of the EU would be valid. The agreement was signed between the Telecom Foundation and PTCL, and the telecommunication foundation made agreements with the employees under the said agreement. PTCL employees and employees employed to perform PTCL duties at the International Gateway Exchange, whether employees engage directly or through a contractor, will be considered employees of the establishment whose benefits include telecom The Foundation had no say in the functioning of the International. The gateway exchange, which is primarily the work of the PTCL, as a matter of service terms and conditions, had no jurisdiction to entertain or accept the constitutional petition. It was announced that PTCL was found law firms from Talamba lawyer