MIAN BAHADUR SHAH versus SAID AFZAL
Sections 13 and 17 of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), the execution of the section 115 injunction, the objection to the injunction passed by the Rent Controller remains objectionable to the Supreme Court, during the hearing of the petitioner, on the occasion of execution However, the respondent, the court filed the petitioner's execution, according to his statement before the Supreme Court, the appellate court rejected the petitioner's execution, against which the order of dismissal was finally granted. Was. , But the respondents, instead of doing the necessary work, handed over the premises of the suit to the object. Which of the defendants' actions was not only illegal, but it was also laudable because it was against his statement against the plea filed by the Supreme Court on the basis on which he was endorsed. And it was collective that was rejected by the court, but the appellate court failed to allow a request for review and to approve an invalid order / decision by the appellate court, set aside.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocates from Muzaffargarh lawyer