MUHAMMAD IQBAL ALIAS BILLA versus STATE
Section 302 (b) definition of evidence None of the three witnesses, who were close relatives of the deceased, either went to the police station to file a report or informed the police by any means and by the time they arrived. Be present on occasion. About two to two hours after the incident, with no explanation, a prosecution witness also expressed his reluctance to state precisely between the time of the incident and the time of the report, the prosecution's witness statements Had indicated that the complainant's report was the presence of a witness in the prosecution filed after the initial investigation, neither explained in the FIR nor the statements of the other two alleged witnesses. The complainant's statement indicated that at the time of the shooting, there was no other prosecution witness. The scene of the incident and said that the prosecution's witness was allegedly acquitted of the accused due to the testimony of the victim, that the witnesses were also denied false medical evidence and material contradictions in the statements of the eyewitnesses. The medical evidence made the prosecution's case extremely suspicious besides being the victim's relatives, the three alleged witnesses had enmity with the accused and their alleged presence on the occasion confirmed their testimony for two hours after the incident was justified. And did not match the independent credible evidence. In the presence of the witnesses present on the occasion, it was highly suspected that the evidence was not supported by any other reliable evidence of the witnesses at the hearing. The firearms expert's opinion was also lacking in the report because of the alleged alleged b
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
ask a advocate free from Piplan lawyer