Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD BASHIR versus STATION HOUSE OFFICER, OKARA CANTT.

Article 22A (6) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 199 and 185 (3) of the High Court had, in its constitutional jurisdiction, terminated the FIR on the ground that, upon obtaining its compliance, it had a legal relevant The duties from Section H, the complainant did not disclose the dismissal by a former justice of the peace, were moved for the purpose of requesting that the judicial discretion was exercised by the High Court, more than one. For reasons that could not be sustained, first, because the recording of the FIR was not arbitrary relief given by a Section H, Any car can be if the person wishing to enter the criminal case, which has to face such a way that they have been deprived of relief in the equation. Secondly, it seems to have escaped the notice of the High Court that a crime was committed against the State. That the commissioner of such crime was never more than a witness in the notice of the criminal authorities and that the offender was never allowed to escape punishment because of any mistake by an informant while installing machinery. Can be found. The motion may well lie in convicting the defendant of his fault, but no criminal decision of the High Court has been granted as a result of the termination of the FIR, therefore, the Supreme Court, In the circumstances, the application for leave to appeal changed. An appeal was granted as a result of which he was allowed to set aside the decree relating to the denial of the application and the refusal of the High Court's FIR decision. list of supreme court advocates from Kala Bagh lawyer