NADEEM ASGHAR KAIRA versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB THROUGH SECRETARY, LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Article 112 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 19 and 32 Constitutional Petitions The approval of the budget initially presented by the Council and then the government, in the present case, the preparation of the budget made under section 112, Punjab. And failed to verify. Local Government Ordinance, 2001 Council Council has been inactive due to such failure, which resulted in the deprivation of the local population from development activities and programs, ending the financial year but not yet budgeted or approved. The entire development was underway. Depending on if the council failed to prepare the budget, the provincial government was obliged to take action under section 1112 (7) of the Punjab Local Government Ordinance, 2001, which also failed to fulfill its legal obligation and duty, Which included a set of policy principles. Article 32 of the Constitution was that the State would encourage the local government bodies consisting of elected representatives, the responsibility of the respective areas of the area and it was the responsibility of the state to refer the petition to the provincial local government commission. Observe and implement the principle of alternative policy, which is set by the Government of Punjab under the provisions of Sections 131 and 132. The Government Ordinance, 2001 cannot be monitored, especially when there are only a few days left at the expiration of the financial year, even though such treatment cannot be considered effective or speedy in the present case's ridiculous circumstances. Is. The Constitution has given the High Court the power to issue a decree which directs a person to do something for which he must by law
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
