Find a Lawyer

AKIF QAMAR AND ANOTHER versus GENERAL MANAGER (ADMINISTRATION) PASSCO AND OTHERS

Section 4 Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 1212 (3) sought the claim that the applicants, who were reinstated by the Service Tribunal, to seek rehabilitation benefit in favor of the service. Once the service tribunal had demanded the order of the department without legal authority. The award of return benefits will be automatic. The Vidification Petitioners did not plead before the Service Tribunal that during this period, when they were away from work, they did not do any business or had no profitable employment elsewhere. It was held that, even before the Tribunal, no specific request was made by the petitioners. Being unemployed and out of a job, they can be reimbursed for the period during which they were out of work. In the event that the Department's order was declared contrary to the law or without legal authority, the benefits returned in each case were automatically found, and the employee had to demonstrate and plead in front of the original forum. That he was not earning during Perry, in the absence of any special plea and not addressing the matter before the Tribunal, it cannot be assumed that the applicant was left unemployed, staying home and working. I didn't do anything while out. Otherwise, in the event of an individual complaint and a question of fact, no question was raised about the law of public importance, which could result in the dismissal of the appeal for leave and nothing. best advocate from Tharparkar lawyer