Find a Lawyer

ZULFIQAR ALI SHAR versus STATE

Clauses & 409 & 7 47 App Benefits of Doubts Accused is accused of violating criminal trust, the prosecutor must not only confiscate or dominate the property, but it is also alleged that They have been misused, altered, used or disposed of inadvertently. The property itself or that it has intentionally provided assistance to another person to do so unless the accused has acknowledged the receipt of the money and the prosecutor must prove these elements of the crime with conviction. And did not provide a satisfactory explanation of what he did to her. In the present case, the accused, in his statement filed under section 342, CRPC, denied the receipt of the money in the dispute. , The prosecution had failed to prove the contents of the offense under the provisions of Section 409, the PPC accused further convicted of the offense under Section 477A, PPC Was gone The prosecution was headed to prove that the accused, with the intent of defrauding, was made of and made any false entries in the books of accounts, except the statement of the handwriting expert, which showed that certain documents The writing on was similar to the examination of the accused in which the said documents and the sample writing of the accused showed a wide difference in both the writings were not even consistent with the controversial writing as he also said that the writings were identical but they were Did not use the same prosecution word, without any reasonable doubt under the circumstances Under the decision had failed to prove the accused and unjustly convicted him the benefit of doubt was a d list of advocates from Amangarh lawyer