Find a Lawyer

ISLAM HUSSAIN versus CITY DISTRICT GOVERNMENT

Applicants have urged the city government to act promptly against the noise / smoke pollution caused by the safety of the Arts 9 and 199 Provincial Motor Vehicles Ordinance (XIX of 1965), provisions 23 and 115 constitutional petitioner. Instructions should be issued for immediate action against The right of every citizen of the country to have a constitutional right to enjoy polluted air and to breathe clean air, as well as to eliminate illegal bus stands, due to smoke pollution caused by the vehicles in the city, wherever the constitution may be This is guaranteed under Article 9 of the Code. As a matter of right to life, the Deputy Inspector General of Police (Traffic) had been directed by the High Court to drive a smoke emitting vehicle or noise pollution vehicle and take action against these vehicles. Which are not numbers. According to the section 115 of the Provincial Motor Vehicle Ordinance, the Deputy Inspector General of Police (Traffic), 1965, has full authority to blow up any vehicle / rickshaw in which the smoke and noise are driven into the city. best advocate from Dina lawyer