Find a Lawyer

BADARUDDIN versus STATE

Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 365A, 392, 342, 348 and 149 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997); That they were armed with firearms after payment of the ransom, the victim was abducted and released. After the trial, the bail was dropped after the trial, but no name was taken in the FIR after the FIR was filed and only the unidentified persons were affected by the complaining party. Was kidnapped and the accused parties were residents of the same area. It appears that the complaining party did not name the suspects in the FIR, which was filed with two clays with an undisclosed delay, after prosecutors' witnesses recorded their statements after the abduction and Anonymously, without disclosing information about them. , Who appeared to be a respected and well-educated man, had surrendered himself before the operation of the law, and was not involved in the present case except in the present case. In any other criminal activity, the names of the accused were kept in column 2 of the police challan on the basis of the statements made by respected persons of the area, the police officer's opinion was not binding on the police. And the court can face legal proceedings after examining the available substances before adding the accused and they can issue summons to join the accused and further investigation has come out and it cannot be said that There is no proper basis for belief list of supreme court advocates from Kala Shah Kaku lawyer