Find a Lawyer

GHULAM RASUL versus AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK OF PAKISTAN THROUGH MANAGER

Sections 9, 10 and 22 Applying for leave to defend a suit for debt collection One of the material grounds that was emphasized in the defense of applicants was that the bank creditors' mobile credit officer cheated them. The bank's records regarding the last loan allegedly presented to lenders, the sub-manager, the account officer and the bank's cashier admitted about the borrower, the mobile credit officer inquiry said. The search recorded by the bank said the bank's factory itself was enough to give them unconditional leave, including a suitcase. The Knocking Court could have been defended, however, saying that the inquiry report bank was not in a position to say that the lenders had not made any deal for the grant in the given circumstances. The leave to defend the suit borrower, in the case of defending the suit with respect to the loan, remains a good case for the grant of leave which D was accused of having committed. There was no defense from the lenders to the other lenders, nor was they stressed, the decisions and decrees were set aside and the creditors' request was granted. And they were allowed to defend the case, such as a loan that was alleged to have been fraudulent. ask a advocate free from Sahiwal lawyer