Find a Lawyer

SHAHID ZAFAR versus STATE

Section 497 (2) Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 408 Bail, Further Investigation Officer's Grant declared the accused guilty on the statement of the Managing Director and two witnesses, besides an employee of the company, testified There was no direct evidence in the police file to recover the disputed / embezzled amount in the police file which was available by the complainant sent by the complainant to recover the disputed / embezzled amount, It had no identifiable value at the present time and the complainant had to prove the documents during the trial Section 84 08, under the prohibited clause contained in the CRPC, the trial under section 8408, PPC, was not punishable under law offense as it could impose any sentence of imprisonment which could extend to seven years. Can Submitted to the investigating officer by the complainant, was in the custody of the prosecution, there was no possibility of tampering with him. While the trial could still be decided by presenting the prosecution's evidence in the court, the case had not yet begun, and it was enough to bring the accused's case under further investigation. It was a matter of determination whether the accused received the disputed money and it was misused as if it was a matter of accounts, the accused was behind bars, the police did not need him any more, in these circumstances bail. The discount was entitled, guaranteed \ r \ n famous lower court advocate from Laliah lawyer