Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HANIF versus STATE

Section 497 Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Sections 10 (2) and 16 bail, were behind the bars of the accused's jail jail, the investigation of the case was completed, challan was presented to the competent court. The police had no jurisdiction and no further need for further investigation, in their statement filed under CRPC under Section 6464, before the magistrate, for the alleged kidnapping of the prison bars indefinitely. No useful purpose will be presented. She was not kidnapped by anyone and her father / complainant submitted her father / complainant with a serious intention and despite her promise her father / complainant bailed her husband's co-accused Was not allowed to go as approved. Along with the consistency, the accused was also entitled to allow the accused to bail for bail bail \ r \ n divorce advocates from Muridkay lawyer