NAJMUL ARFEEN versus DEWAN METHARAM DHARMADAS TRUST
Sections 15 and 15A Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Application Withdrawal Request The legal legacy of the prospective tenant was allowed to be filed in a private company by a private company. The tenants' confession was that they were the legal heirs of the deceased original tenant, and according to their terms their family settlement, they incorporated a private limited company and were the sole shareholders of the company. Therefore, there was no separate part of the occupation that when the company was registered, a new legal personality had emerged and from the date of its registration it was considered a body corporate or corporation consolidated and separated as an entity. Started working separately. Its shareholders have no relation to the members of a company, such as the tenants involved, to the private company, in the present case, despite the reasons in which it was created. Was a separate entity and therefore it was mischief The Treaty by Section 15 of the Sindh Rented Premise Ordinance, 1979 was attracted to the present matter, due to the fact that the legal tenants of the original tenants were the sole shareholders in the company, There was no turning back from the legal personality and consequently the person's legal person was harmed. The private company has not sought any intervention under which the constitutional application of the hireling controller is dismissed.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
