Sections 9, 22 and 27 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), suit for recovery of section 152 bank loans Accidental slip scope Banking court granted judgment and order in favor of bank up to Rs 67,490 but by bank On the petition filed, an amount of Rs 289,117 was added to the decimal amount as service charges which were deducted due to accidental slip were stated as claiming service charges were Rs. 533,656 / 40. However, the banking court concluded that the application under section 152 had come to the conclusion that it was in fact Rs 289,117 and could not be accidental slip, as It has been claimed that a map of Rs 289,117 can be obtained only after discussions, deliberations and arguments, not just by clerical or typographical error, which was in fact a mandate of section 27 of financial institutions (recovery of finances). Ordinance, 2001 The Banking Court misused Section 152, CPC, and applying the Section 27 (Recovery of Finance) Ordinance of Financial Institutions, in 2001, it provided no scope for accidental sales as requested. I was claimed in the terms of the order as it could not have been a High Court order passed by the Banking Court Which was approved under the circumstances
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
