Find a Lawyer

REHMAT ULLAH versus MUHAMMAD SHAFI

OVI, R1, OX, R1 and Section 100 Second Appeal Claim Object and Scope After filing a litigation impact case, one of the plaintiffs changed their statement to a better statement and stated before the court that the total consideration He did not have to pay Rs. 200,000 from the amount of contempt. The plaintiff in his better statement remained uncontested during his evidence. The trial court pronounced the judgment in favor of the plaintiff. That the defendant's decision of Rs 200,000 was not rational and the judgment passed by it was upheld by the appellate court. The main purpose of the litigation was to keep the opposing parties on notice of the issue that the dispute between the parties was reduced to matters; due to the evidence, attention was paid to the matters. Such action was ensured. In the matter, the aspect was caught in ignorance and thus suffered prejudice, due to the better statement, the specific case was settled in relation to the disputed amount, the parties were fully aware of the claims made by them respectively. The evidence was supported in support of their competing petitions regarding a $ 200,000 contender that was awarded only below. From which it was only proper course was to know that the claimants application was to be trusted or not the courts. Rightly concluded that the defendants had successfully proved their case that the High Court refused to interfere with the decisions in exercise of the jurisdiction of the appeal and dismissed the second appeal from the orders given under the courts. had gone. female advocates from FR Kohat lawyer