BASHIR AHMAD versus STATE
The testimony of section 302/34 of the two versions of the evidence and its presence was not witnessed. The parents of the victim's son and son's deceased had provided proof that the victim was last seen in the company and also At the same time, it was said that the prosecution's witnesses were not shy. Was lying and he tried to get the accused's wife involved and acquitted the accused of statements that the witnesses suffered a natural error and no other independent evidence was supported by a defense defense request. Which is more understandable and was created by the circumstances of the case. , The plaintiff's and FIR's statement received further support from the site of the minor contradiction, to no avail, when the prosecution failed to prove its case against the accused, a decision passed by the trial court Was set aside and acquitted of the charges. Was charged and released
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of advocates from Daur lawyer