Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASHRAF versus STATE

Section 497 Prevention Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 324, 109, 148 and 149 bail, denied the accused's version and his co-accused during the investigation stated that the complaining party was the assailant and that he had fired first. Had started and the accused party had taken action. No one was harmed by the accused in exercising his right to defense. Although the local police and D-section P have given their opinion that the other party was the attacker, the opinion of the police was not binding on the court in which the challan Had already been presented. The court and the accused were designated as the main character of the firing on the back of the injured person, which was also supported by medical evidence and the injured prosecution witness was also charged with the recovery of the weapon, in which the accused's first The aspect was related to the offense covered under the Prohibited Clause. Section 497, the case of CCP suspects was not the same as in the case of a co-accused who has already been granted bail by the High Court because they were not liable. Deleted Pakistan, top advocate family court from Shorkot lawyer