Find a Lawyer

GHULAM HUSSAIN BALOCH versus CHIARMAN, NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU, ISLAMABAD

Article 18 and 19 of the Police Rules, 1934, Chi XXV, R 25 2, 25 18 and 25 54 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Petition shows the investigation or investigation initiated against the applicants by the National Accountability Bureau. It is not likely that Chairman NAB had formulated the opinion that under the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, any offense was punished by any person so that in his comments on this important issue, the authorities were silent and Create the option to launch an investigation. This case has adversely affected the entire investigation and investigation process. If the ordinance has no basis for making any allegations of a crime, then the super-structure made on such grounds was bound to collapse without action. I simply mention that the Chairman NAB ordered self-inquiry or the order of self-investigation was not sufficient unless it was also stated that an inquiry or inquiry into a crime must be made, which was punishable under the Ordinance. The nature and commission of any offense in any of the notices issued by the officer to the applicant and others. Were not disclosed and they were silent as well as notice of the subject was popular as they did not state any specific crime or any specific allegation against the accused, any required or specific information, to be presented to the investigating officer. The details of the documents or things were not stated in it, all notices, thus, were found to be irregular and illegal and in the sense of section 19 of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, they could not be declared a legal notice, It has been said that as a result the High Court inquired divorce advocates from Farooqabad lawyer