Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HAROON GABA versus STATE

Section 497 Customs Act (IV of 1969), Sections 2 (s), 156 (1) (8), (89) and 185 (F) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 guarantee, change of application of bail to constitutional application Refusing to do so, the complainant examined the suspect's belongings, but it did not hurt, however, the slab of gold weighing 800 towels and the gold jewelry weighing 4995 grams, were stored in various parts of his body. When the required notice was issued to the accused and the search was made in the presence of two witnesses, the accused's proceedings came under the definition of \ smuggling 'as described in Section 2 ()) of the Customs Act 1969, when secretly and secretly. Yes The import or import duty on gold was violated or the duty was violated, duty was brought to the country or departing from the airport, the import process was complete, the accused was a crime, under the Customs Act. Under section 156 (1) (8) of 1969, the punishment was 14. The year \ RI and not under section 156 (1) (89) of the Customs Act, 1969, impose a 5-year sentence, as claimed by the defendant, could not prove that the smuggled gold belongs to someone else. And that was just a career case. Under the prohibited clause of Section 7497 against the accused, the CCP accused, under the circumstances, was not entitled to the approval of the bail application which was converted into a constitutional petition, was dismissed, under circumstances \ r \ n \ r \ n famous high court advocate from Tando Jam lawyer